At first it seemed preposterous. The
hypothesis was so exotic that I laughed. The rise and fall of violent crime
during the second half of the 20th century and first years of the 21st were
caused, it proposed, not by changes in policing or imprisonment, single
parenthood, recession, crack cocaine or the legalisation of abortion, but
mainly by â€¦ lead.
don't mean bullets. The crime waves that afflicted many parts of the world and
then, against all predictions, collapsed, were ascribed, in an article published by Mother Jones last week, to the rise and fall in the use of lead-based paint and
It's ridiculous â€“ until you see the
evidence. Studies between cities, states and nations show that the rise and
fall in crime follows, with a roughly 20-year lag, the rise and fall in the
exposure of infants to trace quantities of lead. But all that gives us is
correlation: an association that could be coincidental. The Mother Jones
article, which is based on several scientific papers, claimed causation.
I began by reading the papers. Do they
say what the article claims? They do. Then I looked up the citations: the
discussion of those papers in the scientific literature. The three whose
citations I checked have been mentioned, between them, 301 times. I went
through all these papers (except the handful in foreign languages), as well as
dozens of others. To my astonishment, I could find just one study attacking the
thesis, and this was sponsored by the Ethyl Corporation, which happens to have
been a major manufacturer of the petrol additive tetraethyl lead. I found many
more supporting it. Crazy as this seems, it really does look as if lead
poisoning could be the major cause of the rise and fall of violent crime.
The curve is much the same in all the
countries these papers have studied. Lead was withdrawn first from paint and
then from petrol at different times in different places (beginning in the 1970s
in the US in the case of petrol, and the 1990s in many parts of Europe), yet
despite these different times and different circumstances, the pattern is the
same: violent crime peaks around 20 years after lead pollution peaks. The crime
rates in big and small cities in the US, once wildly different, have now
converged, also some 20 years after the phase-out.
Nothing else seems to explain these
trends. The researchers have taken great pains to correct for the obvious
complicating variables: social, economic and legal factors. One paper found,
after 15 variables had been taken into account, a four-fold increase in
homicides in US counties with the highest lead pollution. Another discovered
that lead levels appeared to explain 90% of the difference in rates of
aggravated assault between US cities.
A study in Cincinnati finds that young
people prosecuted for delinquency are four times more likely than the general
population to have high levels of lead in their bones. A meta-analysis (a study
of studies) of 19 papers found no evidence that other factors could explain the
correlation between exposure to lead and conduct problems in young people.
really so surprising that a highly potent nerve toxin causes behavioural
change? The devastating and permanent impacts of even very low levels of lead
on IQ have been known for many decades.Behavioural effects were first documented in 1943:
infants who had tragically chewed the leaded paint off the railings of their
cots were found, years after they had recovered from acute poisoning, to be
highly disposed to aggression and violence.
poisoning in infancy, even at very low levels, impairs the development of those
parts of the brain (the anterior cingulate cortex and prefrontal cortex) that regulate behaviour and mood. The
effect is stronger in boys than in girls. Lead poisoning is associated with
attention deficit disorder, impulsiveness, aggression and, according to one
paper, psychopathy. Lead is so toxic that it is unsafe at any level.
they were more likely to live in inner cities, in unrenovated housing whose
lead paint was peeling and beside busy roads, African Americans have been
subjected to higher average levels of lead poisoning than white Americans. One
study, published in 1986, found that 18% of white children but 52% of black
children in the US had over 20 milligrammes per decilitre of lead in their
blood; another found that, between 1976 and 1980, black infants were eight
times more likely to be carrying the horrendous load of 40mg/dl. This, two
papers propose, could explain much of the difference in crime rates between
black and white Americans, and the supposed difference in IQ trumpeted by the
book The Bell Curve.
is only one remaining manufacturer of tetraethyl lead on earth. It's based in
Ellesmere Port in Britain, and it's called Innospec. The product has long been
banned from general sale in the UK, but the company admits on its website that it's still selling this poison to other countries. Innospec refuses
to talk to me, but other reports claim that tetraethyl lead is being exported
to Afghanistan, Algeria, Burma, Iraq, North Korea, Sierra Leone and Yemen,
countries afflicted either by chaos or by governments who don't give a damn
about their people.
2010 the company admitted that, under the name Associated Octel, it had paid millions of dollars in bribes to officials in Iraq and Indonesia to be allowed to continue, at immense
profit, selling tetratethyl lead. Through an agreement with the British and
American courts, Innospec was let off so lightly that Lord Justice Thomas
complained that "no such arrangement should be made again". God
knows how many lives this firm has ruined.
The UK government tells me that because
tetraethyl lead is not on the European list of controlled exports, there is
nothing to prevent Innospec from selling to whoever it wants. There's a term
for this: environmental racism.
If it is true that lead pollution,
whose wider impacts have been recognised for decades, has driven the rise and
fall of violence, then there lies, behind the crimes that have destroyed so
many lives and filled so many prisons, a much greater crime.